Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 51-59, January 2006

Spin-lock MRI with amplitude- and phase-modulated adiabatic waveforms: an MR simulation study

  • Saeid Taheri

      Affiliations

    • University of New Mexico BRaIN center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
  • ,
  • Rohit Sood

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, HSC, MRI unit, University of New Mexico BRaIN center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 505 272 5869.

Received 9 August 2005; accepted 16 October 2005. published online 19 December 2005.

Abstract 

Introduction

Image contrast between tissue types can be generated based on their T1/T2 ratio using spin-lock MRI techniques. An interesting application of such a concept would be to generate contrast in tissue with tissue relaxation times modified using exogenous contrast agents. An amplitude-modulated adiabatic waveform has been shown in the past to perform spin-lock MRI. However, implementation of this waveform may not prove to be efficient and practical in research or a clinical setup due to high radiofrequency power deposition. Recent advancement in software and hardware MR technology allows implementation of amplitude- and phase-modulated adiabatic waveforms on MR systems. The aim of this work was to explore role of adiabatic waveforms in performing ρ imaging and demonstrate that amplitude- and phase-modulated waveforms [e.g., hyperbolic secant, B1 independent rotation-4 (BIR-4) waveforms] can be used to distinguish materials that differ in T1/T2 ratio.

Methods and Results

MR simulation was performed using computer routines implemented in MATLAB environment (Mathworks, Natick, MA). Modified Bloch equations with trapezoidal, hyperbolic secant and BIR-4 waveforms were used to perform MR simulation. Trapezoidal waveforms were only used for comparison to other waveforms. Gadolinium DTPA (Gad-DTPA) (T1/T2∼1) and manganese chloride (MnCl2) (T1/T2∼10) were used as examples of contrast agents due to their routine use in clinical and research setups and more importantly because they provide good examples of materials differing in T1/T2 ratios. Results of spin locking using trapezoidal waveform agree very well with the previously published results, thereby validating the computer routines used in this MR simulation. Plots of Mρ (magnetization vector in ρ domain) vs. offset frequency show distinct curves for these materials differing in T1/T2 for the three waveforms. BIR-4 waveform demonstrated a 40% difference in Mρ (∼150 Hz) for the materials. Rate of spin lock with hyperbolic secant waveform was rapid compared to other waveforms.

Discussion

MR simulation using contrast agents Gad-DTPA and MnCl2 provided a useful way to demonstrate that amplitude- and phase-modulated adiabatic waveforms can be used to perform spin-lock imaging. Future work involves implementation of these waveforms on MR scanners and performing in vivo imaging to generate tissue contrast based on relaxation times ratio.

Keywords: MRI, Adiabatic, Spin lock, Spin tip, T1, T2, Trapezoidal, Hyperbolic secant, BIR-4, ρ Imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

 

PII: S0730-725X(05)00325-5

doi:10.1016/j.mri.2005.10.020

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 51-59, January 2006