Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 24, Issue 5 , Pages 591-596, June 2006

Strategies for reducing large fMRI data sets for independent component analysis

  • Ze Wang

      Affiliations

    • Center for Functional Neuroimaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Center for Functional Neuroimaging, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Tel.: +1 215 662 7341; fax: +1 215 349 8260.
  • ,
  • Jiongjiong Wang

      Affiliations

    • Center for Functional Neuroimaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
  • ,
  • Vince Calhoun

      Affiliations

    • Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT 06106, USA
    • Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
  • ,
  • Hengyi Rao

      Affiliations

    • Center for Functional Neuroimaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
  • ,
  • John A. Detre

      Affiliations

    • Center for Functional Neuroimaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
  • ,
  • Anna R. Childress

      Affiliations

    • Treatment Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Received 27 September 2005; accepted 19 December 2005. published online 21 February 2006.

Abstract 

In independent component analysis (ICA), principal component analysis (PCA) is generally used to reduce the raw data to a few principal components (PCs) through eigenvector decomposition (EVD) on the data covariance matrix. Although this works for spatial ICA (sICA) on moderately sized fMRI data, it is intractable for temporal ICA (tICA), since typical fMRI data have a high spatial dimension, resulting in an unmanageable data covariance matrix. To solve this problem, two practical data reduction methods are presented in this paper. The first solution is to calculate the PCs of tICA from the PCs of sICA. This approach works well for moderately sized fMRI data; however, it is highly computationally intensive, even intractable, when the number of scans increases. The second solution proposed is to perform PCA decomposition via a cascade recursive least squared (CRLS) network, which provides a uniform data reduction solution for both sICA and tICA. Without the need to calculate the covariance matrix, CRLS extracts PCs directly from the raw data, and the PC extraction can be terminated after computing an arbitrary number of PCs without the need to estimate the whole set of PCs. Moreover, when the whole data set becomes too large to be loaded into the machine memory, CRLS-PCA can save data retrieval time by reading the data once, while the conventional PCA requires numerous data retrieval steps for both covariance matrix calculation and PC extractions. Real fMRI data were used to evaluate the PC extraction precision, computational expense, and memory usage of the presented methods.

Keywords: Independent component analysis, fMRI, Principal component analysis, Cascade recursive least squared networks

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

 

PII: S0730-725X(05)00410-8

doi:10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.013

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 24, Issue 5 , Pages 591-596, June 2006