Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 24, Issue 5 , Pages 591-596 , June 2006

Strategies for reducing large fMRI data sets for independent component analysis

  • Ze Wang

      Affiliations

    • Center for Functional Neuroimaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Center for Functional Neuroimaging, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Tel.: +1 215 662 7341; fax: +1 215 349 8260.
    • ,
  • Jiongjiong Wang

      Affiliations

    • Center for Functional Neuroimaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • ,
  • Vince Calhoun

      Affiliations

    • Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT 06106, USA
    • Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
    • ,
  • Hengyi Rao

      Affiliations

    • Center for Functional Neuroimaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • ,
  • John A. Detre

      Affiliations

    • Center for Functional Neuroimaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • ,
  • Anna R. Childress

      Affiliations

    • Treatment Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Received 27 September 2005 ,Accepted 19 December 2005.

References 

  1. Comon P. Independent component analysis — a new concept?. Signal Processing. 1994;36:287–314
  2. Bell A, Sejnowski TJ. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995;7:1129–1159
  3. Hyvärinen A. Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1999;10(3):626–634
  4. McKeown MJ, Sejnowski TJ. Independent component analysis of fMRI data: examining the assumptions. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6(5-6):368–372
  5. Calhoun V, Adali T, Pearlson G, Pekar J. A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001;14:140–151
  6. McKeown M, Hansen LK, Sejnowski TJ. Independent component analysis for fMRI: what is signal and what is noise?. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13(5):620–629
  7. Biswal BB, Ulmer JL. Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23(2):265–271
  8. Peterson KS, Hansen LK, Kolenda T, Rostrup E, Strother SC. On the independent components of functional neuroimages. In:  Pajunen P,  Karhunen J editor. Proc. int. workshop on independent component analysis and blind signal separation (ICA2000), Helsinki, Finland. 2000;p. 615–620
  9. Calhoun V, Adali T, Pearlson G, Pekar J. Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001;13:43–53
  10. Press W, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, Flannery B. Numerical recipes in C++: the art of scientific computing. 2nd ed.. Cambridge University Press; 2002;
  11. Golub GH, Loan CFV. Matrix computations. 3rd ed.. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996;
  12. Oja E. Neural networks, principal components, and subspaces. Int J Neural Syst. 1989;1(1):61–68
  13. Sanger T. Optimal unsupervised learning in a single-layer linear feedback neural network. Neural Netw. 1989;2:459–473
  14. Abbas H, Fahmy M. Neural model for Karhunen–Loéve transform with application to adaptive image compression. IEE Proc I, Commun Speech Vis. 1994;140(2):135–143
  15. Kung S, Diamantaras K, Taur J. Adaptive principal component extraction (APEX) and applications. IEEE Trans Signal Processing. 1994;42:1202–1217
  16. Bannour S, Azimi-Sadjadi M. Principal component extraction using recursive least squares learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1995;6:457–469
  17. Cichocki A, Kasprzak W, Skarbek W. Adaptive learning algorithm for principal component analysis with partial data. Proc Cybern Syst. 1996;2:1014–1019
  18. Wang Z, Lee Y, Fiori S, Leung C, Zhu Y. An improved sequential method for principal component analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2003;24(9–10):1409–1415
  19. Wilkinson JH. The algebraic eigenvalue problem. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988;
  20. Costa S, Fiori S. Image compression using principal component neural networks. Image Vis Comput. 2001;19:649–668

PII: S0730-725X(05)00410-8

doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.013

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 24, Issue 5 , Pages 591-596 , June 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution