Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 919-927, September 2010

Quantitative analysis of arterial spin labeling FMRI data using a general linear model

  • Luis Hernandez-Garcia

      Affiliations

    • Functional MRI laboratory, University of Michigan, MI 48109, USA
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, MI 48109, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. fMRI Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2108, USA. Tel.: +1 734 763 9254.
  • ,
  • Hesamoddin Jahanian

      Affiliations

    • Functional MRI laboratory, University of Michigan, MI 48109, USA
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, MI 48109, USA
  • ,
  • Daniel B. Rowe

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Marquette University, WI 53233, USA
    • Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, USA

Received 28 November 2009; received in revised form 16 February 2010; accepted 5 March 2010. published online 26 April 2010.

Abstract 

Arterial spin labeling techniques can yield quantitative measures of perfusion by fitting a kinetic model to difference images (tagged-control). Because of the noisy nature of the difference images investigators typically average a large number of tagged versus control difference measurements over long periods of time. This averaging requires that the perfusion signal be at a steady state and not at the transitions between active and baseline states in order to quantitatively estimate activation induced perfusion. This can be an impediment for functional magnetic resonance imaging task experiments. In this work, we introduce a general linear model (GLM) that specifies Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) effects and arterial spin labeling modulation effects and translate them into meaningful, quantitative measures of perfusion by using standard tracer kinetic models. We show that there is a strong association between the perfusion values using our GLM method and the traditional subtraction method, but that our GLM method is more robust to noise.

Keywords: ASL, Perfusion quantification, General linear model

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

 

PII: S0730-725X(10)00098-6

doi:10.1016/j.mri.2010.03.035

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 919-927, September 2010