Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 28, Issue 9 , Pages 1283-1289 , November 2010

Reliability and reproducibility of perfusion MRI in cognitively normal subjects

  • Li Jiang

      Affiliations

    • F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • ,
  • Mina Kim

      Affiliations

    • F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • ,
  • BettyAnn Chodkowski

      Affiliations

    • F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
  • ,
  • Manus J. Donahue

      Affiliations

    • F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
  • ,
  • James J. Pekar

      Affiliations

    • F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
  • ,
  • Peter C.M. Van Zijl

      Affiliations

    • F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Tel.: +1 443 923 9511; fax: +1 410 614 1948.
  • ,
  • Marilyn Albert

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurocognitive Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

Received 4 February 2010 ,Revised 25 April 2010 ,Accepted 8 May 2010.

References 

  1. Wintermark M, Sesay M, Barbier E, Borbely K, Dillon WP, Eastwood JD, et al. Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. J Neuroradiol. 2005;32:294–314
  2. Parkes LM, Rashid W, Chard DT, Tofts PS. Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: Reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:736–743
  3. Alsop DC, Detre JA, Grossman M. Assessment of cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease by spin-labeled magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:93–100
  4. Golay X, Hendrikse J, Lim TC. Perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;15:10–27
  5. Warmuth C, Gunther M, Zimmer C. Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2003;228:523–532
  6. Chalela JA, Alsop DC, Gonzalez-Atavales JB, Maldjian JA, Kasner SE, Detre JA. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke. 2000;31:680–687
  7. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, Esposito G, van Horn JD, Yang Y, et al. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:450–456
  8. Parkes LM, Tofts PS. Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: accounting for capillary water permeability. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:27–41
  9. Zhou J, Wilson DA, Ulatowski JA, Traystman RJ, van Zijl PC. Two-compartment exchange model for perfusion quantification using arterial spin tagging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001;21:440–455
  10. Floyd TF, Ratcliffe SJ, Wang J, Resch B, Detre JA. Precision of the CASL-perfusion MRI technique for the measurement of cerebral blood flow in whole brain and vascular territories. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18:649–655
  11. Lia TQ, Guang Chen Z, Ostergaard L, Hindmarsh T, Moseley ME. Quantification of cerebral blood flow by bolus tracking and artery spin tagging methods. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18:503–512
  12. Golay X, Stuber M, Pruessmann KP, Meier D, Boesiger P. Transfer insensitive labeling technique (TILT): Application to multislice functional perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:454–461
  13. Donahue MJ, Lu HZ, Jones CK, Pekar JJ, van Zijl PCM. An account of the discrepancy between MRI and PET cerebral blood flow measures. A high-field MRI investigation. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:1043–1054
  14. Yen YF, Field AS, Martin EM, Ari N, Burdette JH, Moody DM, et al. Test-retest reproducibility of quantitative CBF measurements using FAIR perfusion MRI and acetazolamide challenge. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:921–928
  15. Jahng GH, Song E, Zhu XP, Matson GB, Weiner MW, Schuff N. Human brain: reliability and reproducibility of pulsed arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;234:909–916
  16. Hermes M, Hagemann D, Britz P, Lieser S, Rock J, Naumann E, et al. Reproducibility of continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI after 7 weeks. Magma (New York, NY). 2007;20:103–115
  17. Grundman M, Petersen RC, Ferris SH, Thomas RG, Aisen PS, Bennett DA, et al. Mild cognitive impairment can be distinguished from Alzheimer disease and normal aging for clinical trials. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:59–66
  18. Kim SG. Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:293–301
  19. Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001;5:143–156
  20. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage. 2002;17:825–841
  21. Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, Liotti M, Freitas CS, Rainey L, et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;10:120–131
  22. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations — uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428
  23. Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation method in adults without musculoskeletal complaints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:2354–2360
  24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error proportional to the mean. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1996;313:106
  25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1996;313:744
  26. Iida H, Miura S, Shoji Y, Ogawa T, Kado H, Narita Y, et al. Noninvasive quantitation of cerebral blood flow using oxygen-15-water and a dual-PET system. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1789–1798
  27. Martin AJ, Friston KJ, Colebatch JG, Frackowiak RS. Decreases in regional cerebral blood flow with normal aging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:684–689
  28. Creasey H, Rapoport SI. The aging human brain. Ann Neurol. 1985;17:2–10

 Grants Support: NIH-NCRR P41015241, Glaxo Smith Kline.

PII: S0730-725X(10)00132-3

doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.05.002

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 28, Issue 9 , Pages 1283-1289 , November 2010